Variable Autonomy through Responsible Robotics: Design Guidelines and Research Agenda

Author:

Reinmund Tyler1ORCID,Salvini Pericle1ORCID,Kunze Lars1ORCID,Jirotka Marina1ORCID,Winfield Alan F. T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Oxford, UK

2. UWE Bristol, UK

Abstract

Physically embodied artificial agents, or robots, are being incorporated into various practical and social contexts, from self-driving cars for personal transportation to assistive robotics in social care. To enable these systems to better perform under changing conditions, designers have proposed to endow robots with varying degrees of autonomous capabilities and the capacity to move between them—an approach known as variable autonomy. Researchers are beginning to understand how robots with fixed autonomous capabilities influence a person’s sense of autonomy, social relations, and, as a result, notions of responsibility; however, addressing these topics in scenarios where robot autonomy dynamically changes is underexplored. To establish a research agenda for variable autonomy that emphasises the responsible design and use of robotics, we conduct a developmental review. Based on a sample of 42 papers, we provide a synthesised definition of variable autonomy to connect currently disjointed research efforts, detail research approaches in variable autonomy to strengthen the empirical basis for subsequent work, characterise the dimensions of variable autonomy, and present design guidelines for variable autonomy research based on responsible robotics.

Funder

EPSRC

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction

Reference145 articles.

1. A Topology of Shared Control Systems—Finding Common Ground in Diversity

2. Sophia Abraham, Zachariah Carmichael, Sreya Banerjee, Rosaura VidalMata, Ankit Agrawal, Md. Nafee Al Islam, Walter Scheirer, and Jane Cleland-Huang. 2021. Adaptive autonomy in human-on-the-loop vision-based robotics systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering–Software Engineering for AI (WAIN ’21). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 113–120. 10.1109/WAIN52551.2021.00025

3. Julie A. Adams, Pramila Rani, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2004. Mixed initiative interaction and robotic systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Supervisory Control of Learning and Adaptive Systems. 6–13.

4. Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N. Bennett, Kori Inkpen, Jaime Teevan, Ruth Kikin-Gil, and Eric Horvitz. 2019. Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, 1–13. 10.1145/3290605.3300233

5. Ironies of automation;Bainbridge Lisanne;Automica,1983

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3