Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI

Author:

Ehsan Upol1ORCID,Saha Koustuv2ORCID,De Choudhury Munmun1ORCID,Riedl Mark O.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. Microsoft Research, Montreal, Canada

3. Georgia Tech, Altanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) systems are sociotechnical in nature; thus, they are subject to the sociotechnical gap-divide between the technical affordances and the social needs. However, charting this gap is challenging. In the context of XAI, we argue that charting the gap improves our problem understanding, which can reflexively provide actionable insights to improve explainability. Utilizing two case studies in distinct domains, we empirically derive a framework that facilitates systematic charting of the sociotechnical gap by connecting AI guidelines in the context of XAI and elucidating how to use them to address the gap. We apply the framework to a third case in a new domain, showcasing its affordances. Finally, we discuss conceptual implications of the framework, share practical considerations in its operationalization, and offer guidance on transferring it to new contexts. By making conceptual and practical contributions to understanding the sociotechnical gap in XAI, the framework expands the XAI design space.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference169 articles.

1. Leena Aarikka-Stenroos and Elina Jaakkola . 2012. Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial marketing management , Vol. 41 , 1 ( 2012 ), 15--26. Leena Aarikka-Stenroos and Elina Jaakkola. 2012. Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial marketing management, Vol. 41, 1 (2012), 15--26.

2. Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable and Intelligible Systems

3. Mark S Ackerman . 2000. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction ( 2000 ). Mark S Ackerman. 2000. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction (2000).

4. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

5. P Agre . 1997 a. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI in Bowker. Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work: Beyond the Great Divide ( 1997 ). P Agre. 1997 a. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI in Bowker. Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work: Beyond the Great Divide (1997).

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3