From Reactive to Active Sensing: A Survey on Information Gathering in Decision-theoretic Planning

Author:

Veiga Tiago1ORCID,Renoux Jennifer2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

2. Center for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems, Örebro University, Sweden

Abstract

In traditional decision-theoretic planning, information gathering is a means to a goal. The agent receives information about its environment (state or observation) and uses it as a way to optimize a state-based reward function. Recent works, however, have focused on application domains in which information gathering is not only the mean but the goal itself. The agent must optimize its knowledge of the environment. However, traditional Markov-based decision-theoretic models cannot account for rewarding the agent based on its knowledge, which leads to the development of many approaches to overcome this limitation. We survey recent approaches for using decision-theoretic models in information-gathering scenarios, highlighting common practices and existing generic models, and show that existing methods can be categorized into three classes: reactive sensing , single-agent active sensing , and multi-agent active sensing . Finally, we highlight potential research gaps and suggest directions for future research.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference80 articles.

1. A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

2. Game-Theoretic Goal Recognition Models with Applications to Security Domains

3. Mauricio Araya-López, Olivier Buffet, Vincent Thomas, and François Charpillet. 2010. A POMDP extension with belief-dependent rewards. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS’10), John D. Lafferty, Christopher K. I. Williams, John Shawe-Taylor, Richard S. Zemel, and Aron Culotta (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 64–72.

4. Oracular Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes: A Very Special Case

5. An approach to autonomous science by modeling geological knowledge in a Bayesian framework

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3