Affiliation:
1. Northeastern University and MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
2. The University of Texas at Austin
Abstract
Methods for mechanically synthesizing concurrent programs for temporal logic specifications have been proposed by Emerson and Clarke and by Manna and Wolper. An important advantage of these synthesis methods is that they obviate the need to manually compose a program and manually construct a proof of its correctness. A serious drawback of these methods in practice, however, is that they produce concurrent programs for models of computation that are often unrealistic, involving highly centralized system architecture (Manna and Wolper), processes with global information about the system state (Emerson and Clarke), or reactive modules that can read all of their inputs in one atomic step (Anuchitanukul and Manna, and Pnueli and Rosner). Even simple synchronization protocols based on atomic read/write primitives such as Peterson's solution to the mutual exclusion problem have remained outside the scope of practical mechanical synthesis methods. In this paper, we show how to mechanically synthesize in more realistic computational models solutions to synchronization problems. We illustrate the method by synthesizing Peterson's solution to the mutual exclusion problem.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Model and Program Repair via Group Actions;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023
2. Model and Program Repair via SAT Solving;ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems;2018-03-31
3. LCL Problems on Grids;Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing;2017-07-25
4. Synthesis of large dynamic concurrent programs from dynamic specifications;Formal Methods in System Design;2016-04
5. Fast, Flexible, and Minimal CTL Synthesis via SMT;Computer Aided Verification;2016