Record Fusion via Inference and Data Augmentation

Author:

Heidari Alireza1ORCID,Michalopoulos George1ORCID,Ilyas Ihab F.1ORCID,Rekatsinas Theodoros2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

2. Department of Computer Science, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

We introduce a learning framework for the problem of unifying conflicting data in multiple records referring to the same entity—we call this problem “record fusion.” Record fusion generalizes two known problems: “data fusion” and “golden record.” Our approach expresses record fusion as a learning problem over probabilistic models. In contrast to prior approaches, our method achieves high performance with or without the records source information and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Furthermore, we show how our learned fusion model can solve the problem of scarcity of training data. On multiple datasets, we show that our framework fuses records with an average precision of ∼98% when source information is available and ∼94% without source information across a diverse array of datasets. We compare our approach to a comprehensive collection of data fusion and entity consolidation methods, ranging from source information–related methods to approaches that do not need any source information. We show that our approach can achieve an average improvement of ∼20/∼45 precision points with/without source information. Our data augmentation method improves previous approaches an average of ∼10 precision points.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference45 articles.

1. Bahadir Ismail Aydin, Yavuz Selim Yilmaz, Yaliang Li, Qi Li, Jing Gao, and Murat Demirbas. 2014. Crowdsourcing for multiple-choice question answering. In AAAI. Citeseer, 2946–2953.

2. Jens Bleiholder and Felix Naumann. 2006. Conflict Handling Strategies in an Integrated Information System. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät.

3. One-Unambiguous Regular Languages

4. Chris Buckley, Matthew Lease, and Mark D. Smucker. 2010. Overview of the TREC 2010 relevance feedback track (notebook). In 19th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC’10).

5. Crowdsourcing Database Systems: Overview and Challenges

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3