Acquiring causal knowledge from text using the connective marker tame

Author:

Inui Takashi1,Inui Kentaro2,Matsumoto Yuji2

Affiliation:

1. Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Yamato, Japan

2. School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with automatic knowledge acquisition from text, specifically the acquisition of causal relations . A causal relation is the relation existing between two events such that one event causes (or enables) the other event, such as “hard rain causes flooding” or “taking a train requires buying a ticket.” In previous work these relations have been classified into several types based on a variety of points of view. In this work, we consider four types of causal relations--- cause , effect , precond(ition) and means ---mainly based on agents' volitionality, as proposed in the research field of discourse understanding. The idea behind knowledge acquisition is to use resultative connective markers, such as “because,” “but,” and “if” as linguistic cues. However, there is no guarantee that a given connective marker always signals the same type of causal relation. Therefore, we need to create a computational model that is able to classify samples according to the causal relation. To examine how accurately we can automatically acquire causal knowledge, we attempted an experiment using Japanese newspaper articles, focusing on the resultative connective “tame.” By using machine-learning techniques, we achieved 80% recall with over 95% precision for the cause , precond , and means relations, and 30% recall with 90% precision for the effect relation. Furthermore, the classification results suggest that one can expect to acquire over 27,000 instances of causal relations from 1 year of Japanese newspaper articles.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference54 articles.

1. Allen J. F. 1983. Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady and R.C. Berwick (Eds.) Computational models of discourse. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]] Allen J. F. 1983. Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady and R.C. Berwick (Eds.) Computational models of discourse. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]]

2. Allen J. F. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cumming New York.]] Allen J. F. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cumming New York.]]

3. Causal linking in spoken and written English;Altenberg B.;Studia Linguistica,1984

4. Britannica. 1998. Britannica CD98 multimedia edition.]] Britannica. 1998. Britannica CD98 multimedia edition.]]

5. Carberry S. 1990. Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]] Carberry S. 1990. Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]]

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3