Affiliation:
1. Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Yamato, Japan
2. School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan
Abstract
In this paper, we deal with automatic knowledge acquisition from text, specifically the acquisition of
causal relations
. A causal relation is the relation existing between two events such that one event causes (or enables) the other event, such as “hard rain causes flooding” or “taking a train requires buying a ticket.” In previous work these relations have been classified into several types based on a variety of points of view. In this work, we consider four types of causal relations---
cause
,
effect
,
precond(ition)
and
means
---mainly based on agents' volitionality, as proposed in the research field of discourse understanding. The idea behind knowledge acquisition is to use resultative connective markers, such as “because,” “but,” and “if” as linguistic cues. However, there is no guarantee that a given connective marker always signals the same type of causal relation. Therefore, we need to create a computational model that is able to classify samples according to the causal relation. To examine how accurately we can automatically acquire causal knowledge, we attempted an experiment using Japanese newspaper articles, focusing on the resultative connective “tame.” By using machine-learning techniques, we achieved 80% recall with over 95% precision for the
cause
,
precond
, and
means
relations, and 30% recall with 90% precision for the
effect
relation. Furthermore, the classification results suggest that one can expect to acquire over 27,000 instances of causal relations from 1 year of Japanese newspaper articles.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference54 articles.
1. Allen J. F. 1983. Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady and R.C. Berwick (Eds.) Computational models of discourse. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]] Allen J. F. 1983. Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady and R.C. Berwick (Eds.) Computational models of discourse. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]]
2. Allen J. F. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cumming New York.]] Allen J. F. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cumming New York.]]
3. Causal linking in spoken and written English;Altenberg B.;Studia Linguistica,1984
4. Britannica. 1998. Britannica CD98 multimedia edition.]] Britannica. 1998. Britannica CD98 multimedia edition.]]
5. Carberry S. 1990. Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]] Carberry S. 1990. Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. MIT Press Cambridge MA.]]
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献