Author:
Godyń Izabela,Kountouris Yiannis,Sauer Johannes
Abstract
This paper presents results of the study on preferences of inhabitants of the Częstochowa Region in Poland in the field of groundwater protection. The choice experiment (CE) method was applied, and willingness to pay (WTP) for improving groundwater quality through the development of sewerage systems was assessed. The results indicate that there is substantial WTP for water quality improvements. Households are willing to pay 18.25 PLN (4.43 EUR) per month to remain pollution at the maximum safe level according to EU regulations (reducing nitrate concentration in groundwater to 50 mg∙L-1). Our results add to the expanding literature on the valuation of water resources and can be useful in analysis of investment effectiveness, in the valuation of environmental costs and benefits related to improvement or deterioration of groundwater condition, and in the pricing policy debate in terms of fees and prices for water and water services.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference41 articles.
1. Andreopoulos D., Damigos D., Comiti F., Fischer C., Estimating the Non-Market Benefits of Climate Change Adaptation of River Ecosystem Services: A Choice Experiment Application in the Aoos Basin, Greece, “Environmental Science & Policy” 2015, Vol. 45, pp. 92-103.
2. Aulong S., Rinaudo J.-D., Assessing the Benefits of Different Groundwater Protection Levels. Results and Lessons Learnt from a Contingent Valuation Survey in the Upper Rhine Valley Aquifer, France, 13th IWRA World Water Congress 2008, Monpellier, France 2008.
3. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Georgiou S., Lake I., The Aggregation of Environmental Benefi t Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP, “Ecological Economics” 2006, Vol. 60, pp. 450–460.
4. Bąk A., Mikroekonometryczne metody badania preferencji konsumentów z wykorzystaniem Programu R, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2013.
5. Birol E., Das S., Estimating the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment: The Case of River Ganga, India, “Journal of Environmental Management” 2010, Vol. 91, pp. 2163–2171.