Sport shooters in Poland: social capital of organizational engagement vs access to guns policy controversies

Author:

Kołodziej ArkadiuszORCID,Kołodziej-Durnaś AgnieszkaORCID

Abstract

The article presents sport shooting in Poland against a socio-political background. First, Polish society after the anti-communist breakthrough is diagnosed as a country lacking social capital and social trust in particular. In this context, membership in sport clubs, treated as a form of social involvement, is very desirable, as it expands the network of social cooperation. However, being a sport shooter is also associated with access to weapons, which is always controversial, even if Poland has low rates of access to firearms for citizens. The authors conducted research (CAWI, N = 253) on sport shooters in Poland. The results (opinions of sport shooters) are analyzed in three contexts: possession of a weapon and attitude towards a weapon (motivation to engage in sport shooting), sport shooting clubs (analysis of sport shooting organizations in Poland), and the image of a sport shooter (assessment of sport shooters’ image in Polish society). A basic problem that emerges from the empirical analysis is the heterogeneous interpretation of sport shooting by the shooters themselves. Shooting can be seen in terms of sport (an activity aimed at self-improvement and competition) as well as an activity with out-of-sport goals (patriotic, educational, and defensive). Different definitions of joint activity may lead to interpretative (of meaning) tensions and ultimately to conflicts within the examined category of people.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

General Engineering

Reference49 articles.

1. Asadullah M.N. (2017), Who Trusts Others? Community and Individual Determinants of Social Capital in a Low-Income Country, “Cambridge Journal of Economics”, vol. 41(2), pp. 515–544.

2. Azrael D., Hepburn L., Hemenway D., Miller M. (2017), The Stock and Flow of U.S. Firearms: Results from the 2015 National Firearms Survey, “The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences”, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 38–57.

3. Betz M.E., Azrael D., Barber C., Miller M. (2016), Public opinion regarding whether speaking with patients about firearms is appropriate: Results of a national survey, “Annals of Internal Medicine”, vol. 165(8), pp. 543–550.

4. Będzik B. (2010), Deficyt kapitału społecznego zwiastunem nadchodzących kłopotów, “Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia”, vol. 9(1), pp. 15–22.

5. Breuer C. (2014), Sport for development – the role of sports clubs, Conference: The 2nd International Symposium on International Development and Peace through Sport, [in:] TokyoVolume: National Institute of Fitness and Health & University of Tsukuba (ed.), The 2nd International Symposium on International Development and Peace through Sport, National Institute of Fitness and Health, University of Tsukuba, Tokyo, pp. 53–65, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4524.9607

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3