Decision-Making Engagement Preferences among Older Adults with CKD

Author:

Gonzales Kristina M.12ORCID,Koch-Weser Susan3,Kennefick Kristen2,Lynch Mary2,Porteny Thalia4,Tighiouart Hocine56ORCID,Wong John B.56ORCID,Isakova Tamara7ORCID,Rifkin Dena E.8ORCID,Gordon Elisa J.9ORCID,Rossi Ana10ORCID,Weiner Daniel E.11ORCID,Ladin Keren12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts

2. Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, Massachusetts

3. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York

5. Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

6. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts

7. Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

8. Division of Nephrology, Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California

9. Department of Surgery, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

10. Piedmont Transplant Institute, Atlanta, Georgia

11. Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Key Points Clinicians’ uncertainty about the degree to which older patients prefer to engage in decision making remains a key barrier to shared decision making.Most older adults with advanced CKD preferred a collaborative or active role in decision making. Background Older adults with kidney failure face preference-sensitive decisions regarding dialysis initiation. Despite recommendations, few older patients with kidney failure experience shared decision making. Clinician uncertainty about the degree to which older patients prefer to engage in decision making remains a key barrier. Methods This study follows a mixed-methods explanatory, longitudinal, sequential design at four diverse US centers with patients (English-fluent, aged ≥70 years, CKD stages 4–5, nondialysis) from 2018 to 2020. Patient preferences for engagement in decision making were assessed using the Control Preferences Scale, reflecting the degree to which patients want to be involved in their decision making: active (the patient prefers to make the final decision), collaborative (the patient wants to share decision making with the clinician), or passive (the patient wants the clinician to make the final decision) roles. Semistructured interviews about engagement and decision making were conducted in two waves (2019, 2020) with purposively sampled patients and clinicians. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used for quantitative analyses; thematic and narrative analyses were used for qualitative data. Results Among 363 patient participants, mean age was 78±6 years, 42% were female, and 21% had a high school education or less. Control Preferences Scale responses reflected that patients preferred to engage actively (48%) or collaboratively (43%) versus passively (8%). Preferred roles remained stable at 3-month follow-up. Seventy-six participants completed interviews (45 patients, 31 clinicians). Four themes emerged: control preference roles reflect levels of decisional engagement; clinicians control information flow, especially about prognosis; adapting a clinical approach to patient preferred roles; and clinicians' responsiveness to patient preferred roles supports patients' satisfaction with shared decision making. Conclusions Most older adults with advanced CKD preferred a collaborative or active role in decision making. Appropriately matched information flow with patient preferences was critical for satisfaction with shared decision making. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Decision Aid for Renal Therapy (DART), NCT03522740.

Funder

Dialysis Clinics

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Engaging Patients in Decision Making about Treatment of Kidney Failure;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2024-05-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3