Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications after Insertion by Surgeons, Radiologists, or Nephrologists

Author:

Ku Elaine123ORCID,Copeland Timothy1ORCID,McCulloch Charles E.3ORCID,Freise Christopher4,Legaspi Sabrina1ORCID,Weinhandl Eric56ORCID,Woo Karen7,Johansen Kirsten L.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

2. Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

4. Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

5. Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, California

6. Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

7. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

8. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Abstract

Significance Statement The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative aims to increase rates of utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. One of the first steps to PD is successful catheter placement, which can be performed by surgeons, interventional radiologists, or nephrologists. We examined the association between operator subspecialty and risk of needing a follow-up procedure in the first 90 days after initial PD catheter implantation. Overall, we found that 15.5% of catheters required revision, removal, or a second catheter placement within 90 days. The odds of requiring a follow-up procedure was 36% higher for interventional radiologists and 86% higher for interventional nephrologists compared with general surgeons. Further research is needed to understand how to optimize the function of catheters across different operator types. Background The US government has implemented incentives to increase the use of PD. Successful placement of PD catheters is an important step to increasing PD utilization rates. Our objective was to compare initial outcomes after PD catheter placement by different types of operators. Methods We included PD-naïve patients insured by Medicare who had a PD catheter inserted between 2010 and 2019. We examined the association between specialty of the operator (general surgeon, vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist, or interventional nephrologist) and odds of needing a follow-up procedure, which we defined as catheter removal, replacement, or revision within 90 days of the initial procedure. Mixed logistic regression models clustered by operator were used to examine the association between operator type and outcomes. Results We included 46,973 patients treated by 5205 operators (71.1% general surgeons, 17.2% vascular surgeons, 9.7% interventional radiologists, 2.0% interventional nephrologists). 15.5% of patients required a follow-up procedure within 90 days of the initial insertion, of whom 2.9% had a second PD catheter implanted, 6.6% underwent PD catheter removal, and 5.9% had a PD catheter revision within 90 days of the initial insertion. In models adjusted for patient and operator characteristics, the odds of requiring a follow-up procedure within 90 days were highest for interventional nephrologists (HR, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 2.22) and interventional radiologists (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.58) followed by vascular surgeons (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.14) compared with general surgeons. Conclusions The probability of needing a follow-up procedure after initial PD catheter placement varied by operator specialty and was higher for interventionalists and lowest for general surgeons.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. In Reply to “The Use of Ultrasound in Peritoneal Dialysis Setting”;American Journal of Kidney Diseases;2024-05

2. Authors' Reply: Prioritizing Skills for Optimal Peritoneal Dialysis Care: A Focus Beyond Specialty;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2024-03

3. Prioritizing Skills for Optimal Peritoneal Dialysis Care: A Focus Beyond Specialty;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2024-03

4. Of Peritoneal Dialysis Access and Home Dialysis Accessibility;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-12-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3