Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms for Proteomic Analysis Using TOPSIS

Author:

Javanbakht T.1,Chakravorty S.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Quebec in Montreal, 201, President Kennedy St., Montreal, Quebec H2X 3Y7, Canada

2. Biju Patnaik University of Technology, Chhend Colony, Rourkela, Odisha 769004, India

Abstract

The present study focuses on a new application of the TOPSIS method for the optimization of machine learning algorithms, supervised neural networks (SNN), the quick classifier (QC), and genetic algorithm (GA) for proteomic analysis. The main hypotheses are that the change in the weights of alternatives could affect the ranking of algorithms. The obtained data confirmed this hypothesis for their ranking. Moreover, adding labor as a cost criterion to the list of criteria did not affect this ranking. This was because candidate 3 had better fuzzy membership degrees than the two other candidates concerning their criteria. This work showed the importance of the value of the fuzzy membership degrees of the cost criterion of the algorithms in their ranks. The values of the fuzzy membership degrees of the algorithms used for proteomic analysis could determine their priority according to their score differences. One of the advantages of this study was that the studied methods could be compared according to their characteristics. Another advantage was that the obtained results could be related to the new ones after improving these methods. The results of this work could be applied in engineering, where the analysis of proteins would be performed with these methods.

Publisher

Sumy State University

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference37 articles.

1. Balioti, V., Tzimopoulos, C., Evangelides, C. (2018). Multi-criteria decision making using TOPSIS method under fuzzy environment. Application in spillway selection. Proceedings, 2, 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2110637.

2. Tlas, M., Ghani, B. A. (2020). Interactive software for classification and ranking procedures based on multi-criteria decision-making algorithms. Computational Ecology and Software, 10(3), 133–150.

3. Rohanah, S. (2018). An evaluation of students performance using TOPSIS and Entropy approaches. IOSR Journal of Research, Method in Education, 8(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0806010106.

4. Sałabun, W., Wątróbski, J., Shekhovtsov, A. (2020). Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? A comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods. Symmetry, 12(9), 1549. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091549.

5. Chang, S. – H., Tseng, H.-E. (2008). Fuzzy Topsis decision method for configuration management. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 15(3), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.23055/ijietap.2008.15.3.147.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. OPTIMIZATION OF CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OUTPUT WITH TOPSIS;Ukrainian Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science;2024

2. Optimization of Cdx Transcription Factors Characteristics;Journal of Engineering Sciences;2023

3. OPTIMIZATION OF OLIGONUCLEOTIDES CHARACTERISTICS WITH TOPSIS;Ukrainian Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3