Affiliation:
1. Slovak University of Agriculture (Slovakia)
Abstract
The paper's main objective is to investigate the differences in competitiveness among the EU member states. Each nation's competitiveness is determined by its government's management capabilities on the national, regional and local levels and thus poses substantial implications to economic growth. For this purpose, hierarchical clustering as the primary method of investigation was selected. The data mining process was based on extracting GCI score data about individual member states. Based on the GCI score evaluation, the cluster analysis showed two groups of EU member states, according to the 'traditional' division of old member states (OMS) and new member states (NMS). Results showed a statistically significant gap in GCI scores between the OMS and NMS. Furthermore, the within-class variability in the OMS cluster appears to be higher than in the NMS cluster, which underlines growing disparities among old member states. Most significant differences among both groups prevail in the field of institutions, ICT adoption, business dynamism and innovation. Finally, the link between achieved GCI score and average economic growth has been investigated. Contrary to expectations, more developed member states (OMS) showed, on average, relatively lower economic growth rates over the investigated period than the less developed member states (NMS). The results showed a moderately negative link between the GCI score and economic growth, which suggests that a higher GCI score does not mean achieving higher economic growth, whereas member states with lower total GCI scores could outpace the higher ones in terms of economic growth. In many aspects, the EU still resembles two rails in Europe, and a significant gap between OMS and NMS prevails. Relatively higher economic growth of NMS might help reduce the gap over time. However, it may prove a short-sighted, and significant lags in many crucial factors will stiff the competitiveness in the long term.
Subject
Metals and Alloys,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference64 articles.
1. Andrijauskiene, M., Dumciuviene, D., & Stundziene, A. (2021). EU framework programmes: positive and negative effects on member states' Innovation performance. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(3), 471-502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Aiginger, K., & Firgo, M. (2017). Regional competitiveness: connecting an old concept with new goals. Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness. [Huggins, R. & Thompson, P., Ed.] Edward Elgar Publishing, USA. [Google Scholar]
3. Aiginger, K., & Vogel, J. (2015). Competitiveness: from a misleading concept to a strategy supporting Beyond GDP goals. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 497-523. DOI 10.1108/CR-06-2015-0052 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Anastassopoulous, G. (2007). Countries international competitiveness and FDI: an empirical analysis of selected EU member-countries and regions.Journal of Economics and Business,10(1), 35-52. ISSN 1108-2992 [Google Scholar]
5. Androniceanu, A. (2020). Major structural changes in the EU policies due to the problems and risks caused by COVID-19. Administratie si Management Public, 34, 137-149. [Google Scholar]
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献