Abstract
Based on the Implicit-Affect-Primes-Effort (IAPE) model (Gendolla, 2012, 2015),
the present experiment investigated the role of prime visibility as a moderator of fear
and anger primes’ effect on cognitive performance. Previous research has revealed
inconsistent effects. Participants worked on a d2 mental concentration task with
integrated pictures of fearful vs. angry faces, which were presented either masked (25
ms) or clearly visible (775 ms). Cognitive performance was assessed in terms of response
accuracy and reaction times. Prime visibility significantly moderated the affect primes’
effect on response accuracy: When the primes were visible, fear expressions resulted in
significantly lower response accuracy than anger primes. The opposite pattern occurred
when the affect primes were masked. Additionally, visible primes led to slower responses
in general, suggesting controlled prime processing. The observed performance effects
corroborate recent findings on physiological measures of resource mobilization in the
context of the IAPE model. Highlights Participants were presented with masked (25 ms)
vs. clearly visible (775 ms) primes of anger or fear during a mental concentration task.
The visibility of the primes significantly moderated the effect of affect primes on
response accuracy. When the primes were visible, fear primes resulted in significantly
lower response accuracy than anger primes. The opposite pattern occurred when the affect
primes were masked. The performance results corroborate recent physiological findings
related to the IAPE model.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献