Towards high–throughput analyses of fecal samples from wildlife
-
Published:2020-07-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:171-183
-
ISSN:2014-928X
-
Container-title:Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Anim. Biodiv. Conserv.
Author:
Sarabia C.1ORCID, Salado I.1ORCID, Cornellas A.1, Fernández-Gil A.1, Vilà C.1ORCID, Leonard J. A.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD–CSIC), Seville, Spain
Abstract
High–throughput sequencing offers new possibilities in molecular ecology and conservation studies. However, its potential has not yet become fully exploited for noninvasive studies of free–ranging animals, such as those based on feces. High–throughput sequencing allows sequencing of short DNA fragments and could allow simultaneous genotyping of a very large number of samples and markers at a low cost. The application of high throughput genotyping to fecal samples from wildlife has been hindered by several labor–intensive steps. We evaluate alternative protocols which could allow higher throughput for two of these steps: sample collection and DNA extraction. Two different field sampling and seven different DNA extraction methods are tested here on grey wolf (Canis lupus) feces. There was high variation in genotyping success rates. The field sampling method based on surface swabbing performed much worse than the extraction from a fecal fragment. In addition, there is a lot of room for improvement in the DNA extraction step. Optimization of protocols can lead to very much more efficient, cheaper and higher throughput noninvasive monitoring. Selection of appropriate markers is still of paramount importance to increase genotyping success.
Publisher
Consorci del Museu de Ciencies Naturals de Barcelona
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference59 articles.
1. Åkesson, M., Liberg, O., Sand, H., Wabakken, P., Bensch, S., Flagstad, Ø., 2016. Genetic rescue in a severely inbred wolf population. Molecular Ecology, 25(19): 4745–4756, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13797 2. Agetsuma–Yanagihara, Y., Inoue, E., Agetsuma, N., 2017. Effects of time and environmental conditions on the quality of DNA extracted from fecal samples for genotyping of wild deer in a warm temperate broad–leaved forest. Mammal Research, 62(2): 201–207, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-016-0305-x 3. Bannasch, D. L., Bannasch, M. J., Ryun, J. R., Famula, T. R., Pedersen, N. C., 2005. Y chromosome analysis in purebred dogs. Mammal Genome 16: 273–280. 4. Barton, K., 2019. MuMIn: Multi–Model Inference. R package version 1.43.6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html 5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2015. Fitting linear mixed–effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1): 1–48, https://doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|