Abstract
The leading treatment for prostate cancer is radical prostatectomy with variations of access to the affected organ which leads to urinary incontinence in the postoperative period. In order to treat this complication, conservative methods, including a wide range of physical factors, are used. The purpose of the article is to conduct an analytical review of the literature on physical methods of treating urinary incontinence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Materials. The review included data from the following electronic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, MedLine, Wiley, World Health Organization, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect, PubMed, eLibrary, CyberLeninka, and disserCat. Results. The research databases include various methods of exercises for the pelvic floor muscles with or without using the method of electromyographic biofeedback, Pilates, general, local, and penile vibratory therapy, transanal, pudendal, and tibial electrical stimulation, electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor muscles and bladder, and extracorporeal magnetic stimulation. Conclusion. It seems impossible to determine the most effective method of rehabilitation due to the large variability of treatment protocols, sample sizes, timing of the start of procedures, techniques, and assessment time points. No study has data on the patients’ catamnesis. Further studies and the search for a drug-free non-invasive method of physical therapy for the rehabilitation of prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy are justified.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference38 articles.
1. 1. The state of oncological care to the population of Russia in 2021. Edited by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. М.: P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation 2022; 239 с. (In Russ.)
2. 2. Kyzlasov P.S., Kazhera A.A., Volodin D.I., Pomeshkin E.V., Bashankaev B.N., Voskanyan S.E. Erectile dysfunction after operations on the organs of small tanks (review of literature). Ural medical journal. 2018; 4 (159): 73-78. DOI 10.25694/URMJ.2018.04.044 (In Russ.)
3. 3. Basiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, Woo HH, Laguna MP, Shemshaki H. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? World J Urol. 2018; 36 (4): 609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1
4. Assessment of early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: patient reported symptoms and impairment;Kielb;J Urol,2001
5. 5. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. Engl J Med 2008; 358 (12): 1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311