Abstract
The article deals with one topical area of work in the field of design in healthcare — the introduction of innovations, IT technologies in medical organizations. The experience of the United States in this area will allow us to understand how design thinking has been developing recently and what development we can expect from it in the near future. The article begins with the introduction of electronic health records in hospitals as a fairly large example of innovation. Of course, as in all IT technologies that have not passed the long test of time, this system has its drawbacks, which are highlighted in the article. The definition of the concept of "systemic risk" is given with the transfer of its essence to the realities in medical organizations. The importance of user experience in the process of implementing certain design solutions is indicated. A new branch of design in medicine is UX design. The emerging tools in this area provide even more inspiration for the design of various innovative products, such as, for example, mobile applications, automatic systems used in their work by doctors, etc. The main trend in the development of future design in healthcare will be consumer orientation.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Parasitology,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology,Soil Science,Plant Science,Soil Science,Plant Science,Soil Science,General Medicine,Philosophy,General Physics and Astronomy,Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Reference12 articles.
1. An investigation on the use of computerized patient care documentation: Preliminary results;Cam;Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences no 16,2008
2. The future of foresight - a US perspective;Coates;Technological Forecasting & Social Change no 77,2010
3. 3. Greenhalgh, T., Potts, H. W., Wong, G., Bark, P., Swinglehurst, D. (2015). Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quarterly, no. 87 (4), pp. 729-788.
4. 4. Jeffery, L. B. (2009). Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating. Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, 43 p.
5. Health care information technology vendors "hold harmless" clause: Implications for patients and clinicians;Koppel;Journal of the American Medical Association no 301 (12),2009