Evidence-Based Approach in the Social Area: Basic Concepts and Guidelines, History, Prospects

Author:

Busygina N.P.1ORCID,Podushkina T.G.2ORCID,Stanilevsky V.V.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State University of Psychology an Education

2. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

3. American University

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of the evidence-based approach in the field of psychological and social practices. The article analyzes the concept of evidence-based practice, its main aspects and components. The authors show that the transfer of the evidence-based approach from medicine, where it originated, to the social sphere was accompanied by significant changes in the very concept of evidence-based practice. Reliance on scientific research of the effects of practice remains the main principle of the evidence-based approach, but in the field of psychosocial practices, the emphasis on the role of interpersonal interaction in the implementation of the practice, involving all its participants in decision-making, including patients/clients/beneficiaries, is no less significant. Unlike medicine, where priority is given to randomized controlled trials, the empirical justification of social practices can be based on other methodologies too, including quasi-experimental studies and even qualitative case descriptions. The danger of bureaucratization of the social sphere due to the introduction of the evidence-based approach is discussed. According to the authors, there is a tendency to understand evidence-based practice as a choice from a limited number of decisions supported by research and/or supported by donors. However, this simplified “drug model”, although convenient for funding organizations, does not correspond to the essence of the evidence-based approach. Proponents of the evidence-based approach certainly support practitioners to use practices with a solid empirical basis, but at the same time to focus on the entire context of interaction with a patient/client, their needs and the capabilities of the social support system.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Reference38 articles.

1. Apel` K.O. Transformaciya filosofii. Per. s nem. V. Kurennogo, B. Skuratova [The Philosophy transformation, translated from German by V. Kurennoy, B. Skuratov]. Moscow: Logos, 2001. 339 p. (In Russ.).

2. Busygina N.P. Nauchnyi status metodologii issledovaniya sluchaev [Scientific status of case study methodology]. Moskovskij psixoterapevticheskij zhurnal = Moscow psychotherapeutic journal, 2009, no. 1, pp. 9—34. (In Russ.).

3. Vasilyuk F.E. Metodologicheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo skhizisa [Methodological meaning of psychological schism]. Voprosy psixologii = Voprosy Psychologii, 1996, no. 6, pp. 25—40. (In Russ.).

4. Vasilyuk F.E. Ponimayushhaya psixoterapiya kak psixotexnicheskaya sistema. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Understanding psychotherapy as a psychotechnical system. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 472 p.

5. Gadamer X.G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki: Per. s nem. Obshh. red. i vstup. st. B.N. Bessonova [Truth and Method: Fundamentals of Philosophical Hermeneutics: translation from German, general edition and introduction B.N. Bessonova]. Moscow: Progress, 1988. 704 p.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3