Humanities Scholars and Library-Based Digital Publishing: New Forms of Publication, New Audiences, New Publishing Roles

Author:

Fenlon Katrina1ORCID,Senseney Megan2ORCID,Bonn Maria3ORCID,Swatscheno Janet4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland

2. University of Arizona Libraries

3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

4. University of Illinois at Chicago

Abstract

The rise of library-based digital scholarly publishing creates new opportunities to meet scholars’ evolving publishing needs. This article presents findings from a national survey of humanities scholars on their attitudes toward digital publishing, the diversification of scholarly products, changing perceptions of authorship, and the desire to reach new audiences. Based on survey findings, the authors offer recommendations for how library publishers can make unique contributions to the scholarly publishing ecosystem and support the advancement of digital scholarship in the humanities by accommodating and sustaining more diverse products of digital scholarship, supporting new modes of authorship, and helping scholars reach broader audiences through interdisciplinary and open access publishing.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

Media Technology,Education

Reference42 articles.

1. The Public Knowledge Project (PKP), a multi-university research initiative founded in 1998, has developed software with broad impact to support open access peer-reviewed publishing. Journals relying on PKP’s Open Journal Systems (OJS) proliferated by the late aughts of the twenty-first century. OJS now supports more than 9000 journals annually, by PKP’s estimate (https://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/ojs-usage/), making it the most widely used open access journal publishing system in the world. In addition, PKP’s Open Monograph Press (2013) offers editorial workflows for and publication of long-form, open access, peer-reviewed works. See The Public Knowledge Project, Stanford University and Simon Fraser University Library, https://pkp.sfu.ca/.

2. See Fulcrum, University of Michigan Library, https://www.fulcrum.org/.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3