Effect of Romanowsky-Stained Concentrated Preparations versus Direct Smears on Veterinary Students’ Ability to Identify Bacterial Sepsis in Fluid Cytology Samples from Dogs, Cats, and Horses

Author:

Hough Veronica A.1,Wycislo Kathryn L.2,Hofmeister Erik H.3,Piech Tara L.4,Maki Lynn C.5,Shaver Stephanie L.5

Affiliation:

1. VetMED Emergency and Specialty Care, 20612 North Cave Creek Road, Phoenix, AZ 85024 USA

2. Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, 19555 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308 USA

3. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, 1130 Wire Road, Auburn, AL 36849 USA

4. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Long Island University, 720 Northern Boulevard, Brookville, NY 11548 USA

5. Department of Specialty Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, 19555 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308 USA

Abstract

Veterinary students’ accuracy, confidence, and time required to diagnose bacterial sepsis in fluid cytology samples was evaluated using two different slide preparation methods: direct smears and cytocentrifuged concentrated preparations. We hypothesized veterinary students would diagnose fluids as septic on concentrated preparations more accurately and quickly than on direct smears. Thirty third- and fourth-year students who had previously participated in a clinical pathology course completed a survey regarding general cytology experience and reviewed 40 randomized Romanowsky-stained slides via microscopy. Slides consisted of 10 septic and 10 non-septic samples with matched direct and concentrated slides, prepared from fluids from dogs, cats, and a horse. Participants’ slide evaluation time, diagnosis, confidence, and slide photographs of areas considered septic were recorded. No difference in diagnostic accuracy between direct and concentrated samples was identified (area under the curve: 57% for both preparations, p = 0.77), although students agreed with pathologist-determined diagnoses more often when viewing concentrated samples ( M = 63%, SD = 11% for concentrated; M = 56%, SD = 21% for direct, p = .012). A positive relationship existed between accuracy of diagnosis ( R2 = .59) and senior status ( p = .002), comfort interpreting cytology slides ( p < .03), and if the student had taken the senior pathology rotation ( p = .02). Only 38% (121/319) of participant photographs correctly identified sepsis. Under experimental conditions, concentrated preparations did not increase the accuracy of veterinary students’ bacterial sepsis diagnosis; however, since accuracy did increase with cytology experience and comfort level, additional pre-clinical and clinical cytology training may benefit students before entering practice.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

General Veterinary,Education,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3