Affiliation:
1. Institute of State and Law, Tyumen State University
Abstract
The paper is devoted to analyzing the impact of somatic biotechnologies on the system of social values of modern society. In the paper «somatic» refers to such technologies that relate to the genetic modification of the human body or its functional systems carried out in various ways. The authors attempt to analyze the main directions of transformation of social institutions of modern Russian society, taking into account advantages and disadvantages of the new technological revolution. Attention is drawn to the risks that biotechnologies pose to society and the state as a whole. The authors substantiate the necessity of participation of the state and various social groups in the development of an optimal strategy reflecting the interests of all stakeholders, based on transparency and trust. The paper indicates that it is necessary to determine the levels of permissible human exposure to various concomitant factors when using biotechnologies. This will require a normative rethinking of the entire concept of human and civil rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation that includes the right to life, its values, the principles of the inalienable fundamental human rights and freedoms, their belonging to everyone from birth, the right to privacy, the right to personal and family secrets, dignity and good name.It is important at the regulatory level to consolidate the legal regime of genetic data about a person in the system of social values, prohibit discrimination based on genetic uniqueness, and develop requirements for medical organizations using somatic biotechnologies. The resolution of future problems involves a theoretical rethinking and normative regulation of new forms of work that will appear in the future, as well as new types of property. The ideas of motherhood and childhood, as well as families, will require new content, which will affect the most important values of society and demand active involvement of the state.
Publisher
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Reference20 articles.
1. Mokhov A. A. Biopravo i strategiya ego razvitiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 201–210.
2. Naumenko T. V., Sekretareva K. N. Kitayskaya sistema sotsialnogo kredita: antiutopiya ili factor obshchestvennogo blagopoluchiya? // Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki. — 2022. — № 3. — S. 419–432.
3. Prikhodko I. I. Teoreticheskie aspekty kontseptsii tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federalnogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravlenie. — 2022. — № 4. — S. 88–96.
4. Shvab K., Devis N. Tekhnologii chetvertoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii. — M., 2018.
5. Naikoo A. A., Thakur Sh. Sh.,Guroo T. A., Lone A. A. Development of Society under the Modern Technology. A Review April 2018 // Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance. — ISSN 2394-3351 5(1):1-8. — DOI: 10.19085/journal.sijbpg050101 (data obrashcheniya: 01.08.2023).