Ethical and Legal Support for Technological Development in the Healthcare System-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Ethical and Legal Support for Technological Development in the Healthcare System

Published:2024-05-03 Issue:1 Volume:3 Page:44-56
ISSN:3034-1647
Container-title:Lex Genetica
language:
Short-container-title:jour

Author:

Morozova N. S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Abstract

The article analyses the experience of a number of foreign countries (France, South Korea, China, Germany and Italy) in terms of developing special legislation in the field of ethical examination and creating specialised bodies to exercise relevant powers. Based on the analysis, the necessity of creating a National Council on Bioethics under the President of the Russian Federation in Russia in order to conduct an independent ethical assessment of new technologies in the field of healthcare is advocated. The author identifies the goal of strengthening the legal personality of medical workers in terms of an initial assessment of technological solutions built into practice. The work highlights the need to develop a procedural basis for conducting technological assessment by the medical community based on clearly established principles of legal and ethical expertise. It is emphasised that all technological solutions presented within the framework of strategic development should be aimed at health-saving ends. At the same time, it is advisable to consolidate the normatively established concept of health-saving technologies in order to carry out an examination of the quality of the implemented technological solutions.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Reference7 articles.

1. Kravets, I. (2022). Constitutional biojurisprudence and promoting bioethical well-being (part 1). Comparative Constitutional Review, 31(2), 16–42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2022-2-16-42

2. Maleina, M.N. (2019). Role of Legal Principles in Eliminating and Minimizing the Risks of Genomic Technologies. Lex Russica, (8), 121–128. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.121-128

3. Mokhov, A.A. (2017). The precautionary principle in biomedicine. Medical Law, (1), 5–10. (In Russ.).

4. Montfort, J.P. (2020, June 10). ‘Biological Safety is Part of the National Security’ – Introduction to China’s Draft Biological Safety Law (Part I). MayerBrown. Avaliable at: https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2020/06/biological-safety-is-part-of-the-national-security-introduction-to-chinas-draft-biological-safety-law-part-i

5. Palm, E., Hansson, S.O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002