Abstract
This paper explores the ‘emerging forms of spatialised and socialised authority’ adopted by tenure-insecure peri-urbanites to secure coveted land in African peri-urban spaces. The paper demonstrates that tenure-insecure peri-urbanites are increasingly utilising various formal and informal institutions – ‘emerging forms of spatialised and socialised authority’, in the form of state functionaries, political party allegiance, traditional leaders, cooperatives, lobbying groups, legal courts, and religion and the occult to access and secure land in African peri-urban spaces. The review demonstrates how land remains of economic, social and emotional importance among tenure-insecure peri-urbanites. It further indicates that tenure-insecure peri-urbanites are not passive but ‘nimble-footed and responsive’, as they find ways to secure land by drawing on various normative orders like the courts and sometimes through evasion, patronage, performance and other means of conviviality. The paper also highlights the complex power dynamics characterising peri-urban areas and underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the multiple actors involved in land governance. The paper recommends the need for effective and inclusive mechanisms of access and security over land to balance the interests of diverse actors and promote the rights of tenure-insecure peri-urbanites in peri-urban spaces. Overall, the paper helps to broaden the scope of actors that need to be engaged in the planning and governance of peri-urban spaces in the age of complex peri-urbanisation processes.
Publisher
University of Johannesburg
Reference89 articles.
1. Akaateba, M. A. (2019). The politics of customary land rights transformation in peri-urban Ghana: Powers of exclusion in the era of land commodification. Land Use Policy, 88(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104197
2. Akrofi, E. O., & Whittal, J. (2011, May). Traditional governance and customary peri-urban land delivery: Aa case study of Asokore-Mampong in Ghana. In Proceedings of the African Geo Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4056.0480
3. Anseeuw, W., & Alden, C. (2010). The Struggle over Land in Africa: conflicts, politics & change. Human Social Science Research Council Press.
4. Arroyo, E. B., Connor, J. L., Gardner, R W., Lacovar, P. A., & Mccarthy, M. H. (2002). The ethics of lobbying: Organised interests, political power and the common good. Georgetown University Press.
5. Bennett, J., Ainslie, A., & Davis, J. (2013). Contested institutions? Traditional leaders and land access and control in communal areas of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Land-use policy, 32, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.011
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献