Development and Demonstration of Tobacco Treatment Measures for Cancer Registries: Novel Metrics for Quality Improvement

Author:

Hutcheson Tresza D.1ORCID,Metcalf Tim2ORCID,Ellerbeck Edward F.1ORCID,Cox Lisa Sanderson1ORCID,Hu Jinxiang3ORCID,Chen Xi3ORCID,Richter Kimber P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

2. 2University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas Cancer Registry, Kansas City, Kansas.

3. 3Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Individuals undergoing cancer treatment have better outcomes when they discontinue tobacco use. Few cancer centers systematically provide evidence-based cessation services. As part of a national quality improvement initiative [Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3i)], we collaborated with our cancer registry to develop and implement two tobacco treatment metrics for tracking the provision of behavioral support and pharmacotherapy. Methods: Post-development, the tobacco treatment metrics were integrated into the registry for all future patients. We used means and frequencies to summarize tobacco treatment for cases treated between 2017 and 2019, coinciding with the timeframe of C3i participation. Results: Of 17,735 cancer cases reviewed, both measures were captured on 17,654 (99.5%) of patients, with 3,091 (17.4%) identified as users of tobacco. Across the 3 years, 557 (18%) of individuals who used tobacco received either tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy or behavioral support; with 478 (15.5%) receiving behavioral counseling, 352 (11.4%) receiving pharmacotherapy, and 273 (8.8%) receiving both—considered gold standard care. Tobacco treatment varied substantially across cancer types. The odds of receiving gold standard care were 2.37 times greater in 2019 compared with 2017. (OR, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.63–3.46; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The new metrics demonstrated high completion rates and their potential to track quality improvement efforts over time. They identified suboptimal treatment reach, but a potential increase in treatment over time and greater treatment among tobacco-related versus nontobacco-related cancers. Impact: Continued tobacco use worsens cancer care outcomes. Integrating measures into cancer registries is a viable option for tracking tobacco treatment and cessation in the context of cancer care.

Funder

Cancer Moonshot

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Reference18 articles.

1. Effective cessation treatment for patients with cancer who smoke: the fourth pillar of cancer care;Fiore;JAMA Netw Open,2019

2. Ignoring the obvious: smoking cessation improves survival;Evans;J Thorac Oncol,2022

3. Smoking cessation: a report of the surgeon general;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,2020

4. NCCN Clinical Practice guidelines in oncology: smoking cessation (Version 2.2022);National Comprehensive Cancer Network

5. New NCCN guidelines: smoking cessation for patients with cancer;Shields;J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3