Bloom's taxonomy and critical thinking in teacher education

Author:

Kabysheva M. O.1

Affiliation:

1. Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University

Abstract

The article analyzes and compares Bloom's traditional and revised taxonomy, focusing on the cognitive domain and, in particular, on knowledge. A two–dimensional model of Bloom's revised taxonomy is proposed for consideration, since an interesting situation has developed in Kazakhstan education now - the hierarchy of cognitive skills is used from the classical taxonomy, while the concept of active verbs is already used from the revised one. We believe that it is necessary in this case to fully use the revised concept, and the article provides an example of a matrix for formulating educational goals. Particular attention is paid to the cognitive skill of application, which some classify as the lowest level of thinking, while others consider it the highest. The article suggests that this skill is transitional, echoing both levels. In addition, the article explores the relationship between critical thinking and Bloom's taxonomy in the context of teacher training. It is considered how the use of Bloom's taxonomy can contribute to the development of critical thinking in future teachers, and what advantages this may have in educational practice. The article provides a better understanding of the evolution of the taxonomy and descriptions of cognitive skills and abilities presented in Bloom's taxonomy, their role in the formation of competent teachers with the ability to think critically and effectively apply knowledge in the learning environment.

Publisher

Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. A Committee of College and University Examiners. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. HANDBOOK 1 Cognitive domain / ed. Benjamin S. Bloom et al. LONGMANS, 1956.

2. Williams M., Lively M., Harper J. Higher Order Thinking Skills: Tools for Bridging the Gap // Foreign Lang Ann. 1994. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 405–426.

3. Anderson L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson Education, 2001.

4. Nussbaum E.M., Edwards O. V. Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices // Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2011. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 443–488.

5. Ngum N.D. The Benefits of Critical Thinking Skills and Techniques for Teaching these Skills in the Classroom for Quality Education // African journal of Social Sciences. 2019. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 99–106.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3