Are Radiologists Contracted by Third Parties to Interpret Radiographs Liable for Not Communicating Results Directly to Patients?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Are Radiologists Contracted by Third Parties to Interpret Radiographs Liable for Not Communicating Results Directly to Patients?

Published:2002-01 Issue:1 Volume:178 Page:27-33
ISSN:0361-803X
Container-title:American Journal of Roentgenology
language:en
Short-container-title:American Journal of Roentgenology

Author:

Berlin Leonard

Publisher

American Roentgen Ray Society

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Adams v Harron, LEXIS 21937 (US 4th Cir 1999)

2. Howard ML. Physician-patient relationship. In: Sanbar SS, Gibofsky A, Firestone MH, LeBlang TR, eds.Legal medicine, 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1988: 247-254

3. Jenoff v Gleason, 521 A2d 1323 (NJ Super Ct App Div 1987)

4. American College of Radiology. ACR standard for communication: diagnostic radiology. In:Standards 2000-2001. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2000: 1-3

5. American College of Radiology Committee on Ethics. Radiology & ethics: communicating radiologic examinations results directly to patients.ACR Bulletin1998; 54(12):17-19

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘Why don't they ever call?’ Expectations of clinicians and pathologists regarding the communication of critical diagnoses in dermatopathology;Pathology;2018-04

2. Critical diagnoses in cytopathology: Experience at a large medical center;Cancer Cytopathology;2017-07-13

3. Breakdowns in communication of radiological findings: an ethical and medico-legal conundrum;Diagnosis;2014-08-19

4. Communicating Findings: A Justification and Framework for Direct Radiologic Disclosure to Patients;American Journal of Roentgenology;2013-03

5. The Concept of Error and Malpractice in Radiology;Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI;2012-08