Fine structure of sensilla on the proboscis of the Indian Honey Bee Apis cerana indica Fabricius (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apidae)
-
Published:2023-10-26
Issue:10
Volume:15
Page:24054-24062
-
ISSN:0974-7907
-
Container-title:Journal of Threatened Taxa
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J. Threat. Taxa
Author:
A.G. Suhas Krishna ,Varija Raghu Shamprasad,Rajashekhar K. Patil
Abstract
Honey bees feed on flowers from which they collect nectar and pollen and their mouth parts are designed for fluid-feedingfrom flowers. The proboscis consists of a ‘tongue’ that includes a long glossa and ends in a spoon-shaped labellum, labial palp, galea and mandibles. The sensilla on the proboscis assists in nectar feeding. A study of the chemosensory hairs on the proboscis was carried out in Apis cerana indica collected from apiaries at the foot of Western Ghats, India. Light- and scanning electron microscopy were employed. In addition, silver staining was carried out to distinguish different types of chemosensilla. The glossa has 60 sensilla chaetica that stain by silver nitrate technique. The length (110 μ), width (2 μ) and spacing of microtrichia on glossa and forked hairs on the labellum are suited for the collection of nectar due to viscosity and to reduce leakiness while feeding. The length of the glossa being short suggests that A. cerana indica feeds on small-sized flowers that are not tubular. The labial palp has sensilla chaetica A and sensilla chaetica B distinguished by their length and sensilla basiconica, all of which are silver nitrate-positive and thus chemosensory in nature. Distal galea has sensilla basiconica, sensilla chaetica A and B and sensilla coeloconica. The maxillary palp is a mechanosensory structure. The bulge on the galea near the maxillary palp has chemosensory sensilla chaetica. Mandibular hairs did not stain with silver and are hence mechanosensory. The sensilla on proboscis in A. cerana indica is comparable to mouth part sensilla in Apis mellifera and Apis florea. The position of the chemosensilla at different regions suggests their role in tasting nectar, detecting the flow of nectar, and the dimensions of the flower and pollen.
Publisher
Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference49 articles.
1. Babu, M.J., S.M. Ankolekar & K.P. Rajashekhar (2011). Castes of the weaver ant Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) differ in the
2. organization of sensilla on their antennae and mouthparts. Current Science 101(6): 755–764.
3. Bhowmik, B., S. Lakare, A. Sen & K. Bhadra (2016). Olfactory stimulation of Apis cerana indica towards different doses of
4. volatile constituents: SEM and EAG approaches. Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology 19(3): 847859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
5. aspen.2016.07.014