Author:
Priya A. Anu,Krishnan T. Pramoth,Suresh C.
Abstract
Detecting breast cancer early is crucial for improving patient survival rates. Using machine learning models to predict breast cancer holds promise for enhancing early detection methods. However, evaluating the effectiveness of these models remains challenging. Therefore, achieving high accuracy in cancer prediction is essential for improving treatment strategies and patient outcomes. By applying various machine learning algorithms to the Breast Cancer Wisconsin Diagnostic dataset, researchers aim to identify the most efficient approach for breast cancer diagnosis. They evaluate the performance of classifiers such as Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree (C4.5), KNN, SVM, and Logistic Regression, considering metrics like confusion matrix, accuracy, and precision. The assessment reveals that Random Forest outperforms other classifiers, achieving the highest accuracy rate of 97%. This study is conducted using the Anaconda environment, Python programming language, and Sci-Kit Learn library, ensuring replicability and accessibility of the findings. In summary, this study demonstrates the potential of machine learning algorithms for breast cancer prediction and highlights Random Forest as the most effective approach. Its findings contribute valuable insights to the field of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Reference36 articles.
1. sjoc Park SH, Han K. Methodologic guide for evaluating clinical performance and effect of artificial intelligence technology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Radiol Soc N Am. 2018;286(3):800–9.
2. Breast Cancer: Statistics, Approved by the Cancer.Net Editorial Board, 04/2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.cancer.net/cance r-types/breast-cancer/statistics. Accessed 26 Aug 2018.
3. Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S, Daniels MI, Watanabe C, Hirose M, Nakamura S. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-feld digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Springer. 2016;24(1):104–10.
4. Kurihara H, Shimizu C, Miyakita Y, Yoshida M, Hamada A, Kanayama Y, Tamura K. Molecular imaging using PET for breast cancer. Springer. 2015;23(1):24–32.
5. Azar AT, El-Said SA. Probabilistic neural network for breast cancer classification. Neural Comput Appl. 2013;23
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Enhanced HAR using Dynamic STGAT;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-03-28