Author:
Freeman Jincong Q.,Shubeck Sarah P.,Chen Nan,Yarlagadda Sudha R.,Nanda Rita,Huo Dezheng,Howard Frederick M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Given increased neoadjuvant therapy use in early-stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, we sought to quantify likelihood of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or endocrine therapy (NET) as a function of ER%/PR%/Ki-67%, 21-gene recurrence scores (RS), or 70-gene risk groups.
Methods
We analyzed the 2010–2020 National Cancer Database. Surgery was categorized as “mastectomy/BCS.” Logistic regression was performed. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were per 10-unit increase in ER%/PR%/Ki-67%.
Results
Overall, 42.3% underwent BCS after NACT, whereas 64.0% did after NET. Increasing ER% (AOR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–0.97) or PR% (AOR=0.98, 95% CI 0.96–0.99) was associated with lower odds of BCS after NACT. Increasing Ki-67% was associated with greater odds of BCS (AOR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.10). Breast-conserving surgery rates increased by ~20 percentage points, with Ki-67% ≥15 or RS >20. Patients with a low (43.0%, AOR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29–0.88) or intermediate (46.4%, AOR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.41–0.81) RS were less likely than patients with a high RS (65.0%) to undergo BCS after NACT. Increasing ER% was associated with higher odds of BCS after NET (AOR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.17). Breast-conserving surgery rates increased by ~20 percentage points between ER <50% and >80%. In both cohorts, the odds of BCS were similar between 70-gene low-risk and high-risk groups. Asian or uninsured patients had lower odds of BCS.
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is unlikely to downstage tumors with a low-intermediate RS, higher ER%/PR%, or lower Ki-67%. Breast-conserving surgery after NET was most dependent on ER%. Findings could facilitate treatment decision-making based on tumor biology and racial/socioeconomic disparities and improve patient counseling on the likelihood of successful BCS.
Funder
Breast Cancer Research Foundation
National Institute on Aging
Susan G. Komen
U.S. Department of Defense
National Cancer Institute
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC