The Minimal Difference as an Individual Threshold to Examine the Utility of a Verification Bout in Determining V̇O2max

Author:

SUCCI PASQUALE J.,BENITEZ BRIAN,KWAK MINYOUNG,BERGSTROM HALEY C.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose A square-wave verification bout to confirm maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) from a graded exercise test (GXT) has been recommended based on mean responses. This study used the test–retest reliability, mean, and individual differences between the highest V̇O2 from the GXT (V̇O2GXT) and verification bout (V̇O2verification) to examine the efficacy of a verification bout in the determination of O2max in healthy, recreationally trained, well-motivated men. Methods Ten men (24 ± 4 yr) completed a GXT on a cycle ergometer followed by a submaximal verification bout to determine V̇O2GXT and V̇O2verification. After completion of the initial GXT, subjects rested for 5 min then performed the verification bout at 90% of the peak power output from the initial GXT. Analyses included a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal differences (MD), and coefficients of variation (COV). Results There was no test (test 1 vs test 2)–method (GXT vs verification) interaction (P = 0.300) and no main effect for test (P = 0.690), but there was a main effect for method (P = 0.003). The V̇O2GXT (46.0 mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1) was significantly greater than V̇O2verification (43.9 mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1), collapsed across test. The V̇O2GXT (ICC = 0.970, SEM = 1.63 mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1, MD = 4.51 mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1, COV = 3.54%) and the V̇O2verification (ICC = 0.953, SEM = 1.87 mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1, MD = 5.17 mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1, COV = 4.25%) demonstrated “excellent” reliability. No subject exceeded the MD test–retest for V̇O2GXT or V̇O2verification. No subject had a V̇O2verification that exceeded V̇O2GXT by more than the MD, but two subjects had a V̇O2GXT, which exceeded V̇O2verification by more than the MD. Conclusions The excellent reliability of V̇O2GXT in addition to the examination of the individual differences between V̇O2GXT and V̇O2verification using the MD indicated that a standalone GXT was sufficient to determine V̇O2max.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. VO2max and training indices as determinants of competitive running performance;J Sports Sci,1983

2. Sex- and age-specific associations between cardiorespiratory fitness, CVD morbidity and all-cause mortality in 266.109 adults;Prev Med,2019

3. Graded exercise testing protocols for the determination of VO2max: historical perspectives, progress, and future considerations;J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp),2016

4. Maximal oxygen intake as an objective measure of cardio-respiratory performance;J Appl Physiol,1955

5. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary;Med Sci Sports Exerc,1995

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3