Affiliation:
1. University of Fort Hare, South Africa.
Abstract
The study explored the prospects of the blended learning approach for post-COVID-19 higher education from the perspectives of instructors at a university in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. The study was qualitative and adopted the interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) design. Using the purposive sampling method, a sample of twenty-eight academics was drawn from one university. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and thematically analysed. The findings revealed that blended learning has prospects for higher education in the post-COVID-19 context; such as accommodating vulnerable students without access to the internet and devices, increasing use of technologies for teaching and learning, facilitation of teaching and learning at any time and place, and solving problems of classroom overcrowding, increasing opportunities for higher education enrolment, breaking communication barriers between university instructors and students, and solving problems of truancy and absence of students and lecturers during the face-to-face lecture hours. In light of these findings, this study concluded that the prospects of blended learning should be harnessed for higher education in the post-COVID-19 context. The present study also considered some recommendations for making the blended learning approach effective in attaining higher education goals. These included increasing investment in the use of technologies for teaching and learning; and ensuring that there is continuous training of instructors in the use of emerging technologies for educational purposes while government at all levels continues to support HEIs for the implementation of the BL delivery system.
Keywords: Blended learning, Online learning, Face-to-face learning, Higher education, University instructors, COVID-19 lockdown
Reference29 articles.
1. Alammary, Ali, Judy Sheard, and Angela Carbone. “Blended Learning in Higher Education: Three Different Design Approaches.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 30, no. 4 (September 9, 2014). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693.
2. Anthony Jnr., Bokolo. “Institutional Factors for Faculty Members’ Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Education + Training 63, no. 5 (June 1, 2021): 701–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2020-0179.
3. Azizan, Siti Norbaya, Angela Siew Hoong Lee, Glenda Crosling, and Graeme Atherton. “Academic Staff’s Perspective on Blended Learning Practices in Higher Education Post COVID-19: A Case Study of a Singaporean University.” Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education 36, no. 2 (January 20, 2022): 205–31. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2021.36.2.11.
4. Badaru, Kazeem Ajasa. “Political Education as a Determinant of University Students’ Political Participation in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.” University of Fort Hare; Faculty of Education, 2019.
5. Badaru, Kazeem Ajasa, and Emmanuel Adu. “Preservice Teachers’ Perception of the Usability of Telephone Conferencing as a Mode of Instructional Delivery in Social Studies.” UNESWA Journal of Education 1, no. 2 (2018): 168–80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342083706_Pre-service_teachers%27_perception_of_the_usability_of_telephone_conferencing_as_a_mode_of_instructional_delivery_in_social_studies.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献