A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 2 study to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RT001 in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Author:

Weemering Daphne N.1ORCID,Midei Mark2,Milner Peter2,Gopalakrishnan Vidhya2,Kumar Anil2,Dannenberg Andrew J.3,Bunte Tommy M.1,Foucher Juliette45,Ingre Caroline45,Ķēniņa Viktorija67,Rallmann Karin8,van den Berg Leonard H.1ORCID,van Eijk Ruben P. A.19ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

2. BioJiva, LLC Los Altos California USA

3. Emerald Bioventures New York New York USA

4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

5. Department of Neurology, ME Neurology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

6. Rare Neurological Disease Centre Riga Stradinš Clinical University Hospital Riga Latvia

7. Department of Biology and Microbiology Riga Stradinš University Riga Latvia

8. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

9. Biostatistics & Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposeRT001 is a deuterated synthetic homologue of linoleic acid, which makes membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids resistant to lipid peroxidation, a process involved in motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).MethodsWe conducted a randomized, multicenter, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Patients with ALS were randomly allocated to receive either RT001 or placebo for 24 weeks. After the double‐blind period, all patients received RT001 during an open‐label phase for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. Key efficacy outcomes included the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS‐R), percent predicted slow vital capacity, and plasma neurofilament light chain concentration.ResultsIn total, 43 patients (RT001 = 21; placebo = 22) were randomized. RT001 was well tolerated; one patient required dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs). Numerically, there were more AEs in the RT001 group compared to the placebo group (71% versus 55%, p = 0.35), with gastrointestinal symptoms being the most common (43% in RT001, 27% in placebo, p = 0.35). Two patients in the RT001 group experienced a serious AE, though unrelated to treatment. The least‐squares mean difference in ALSFRS‐R total score at week 24 of treatment was 1.90 (95% confidence interval = −1.39 to 5.19) in favor of RT001 (p = 0.25). The directions of other efficacy outcomes favored RT001 compared to placebo, although no inferential statistics were performed.ConclusionsInitial data indicate that RT001 is safe and well tolerated. Given the exploratory nature of the study, a larger clinical trial is required to evaluate its efficacy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3