How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant‐supported restorations?: An in vitro study

Author:

Gönder Aykut12,Polat Serdar3,Kılıçarslan Mehmet Ali4,Ocak Mert5,Tamam Evşen3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Republic of Türkiye Social Security Institution (SGK) Ankara Turkey

2. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics Ankara Medipol University Ankara Türkiye

3. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics Gazi University Ankara Turkey

4. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics Ankara University Ankara Turkey

5. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Anatomy Ankara University Ankara Turkey

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different cements and cementation techniques used in implant‐supported restorations and the application of various vent modifications and extraoral replica techniques on the amount of overflowing cement in cemented systems.Materials and MethodsIn this study, three different abutment designs were used as fully closed, occlusal vented, and occlusal + proximal vented. An extraoral replica was produced by milling the CAD/CAM ceramic block. The number of groups with and without replicas was determined as six (n = 10). For the cementation procedures, three different cements were tested: dual‐cure resin, eugenol‐free zinc oxide, and polycarboxylate cements. Cobalt–chromium superstructures to be cemented to the implant analog–abutment complex were produced by direct metal laser sintering method. Twenty‐four hours after the cementation process, residual cement were measered with Micro‐CT. In comparisons between groups, ANOVA test was used for normally distributed variables and Kruskall–Wallis H test was used for non‐normally distributed variables at a significance level of p < 0.05.ResultsThe difference in residual cement volumes between the groups in terms of both cementation techniques (whether or not to use an extraoral replica and different vent desings) and cement types was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was significantly less residual cement in all groups that used extraoral replicas than those that did not. As for the cement types, the most residual cement occurred in the resin cement.ConclusionThe use of extraoral replicas and vent designs on the abutment significantly reduces the amount of residual cement. Regardless of the cementation technique, the type of cement used affects the amount of excess cement.Clinical RelevanceTo reduce residual cement, both the type of cement and the cementation technique used must be considered.

Funder

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry,Oral Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3