Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
2. Department of Psychology University of California Berkeley California USA
Abstract
AbstractThe omission of Native Peoples’ existence, experiences, and perspectives is systematic and widespread across numerous societal domains, referred to as Native omission. In mainstream media, for example, less than 0.5% of representations are of contemporary Native Peoples. We theorize that Native omission is a tool furthering settler colonial goals to oppress and eventually erase Native Peoples. To make this case, we will review both experimental and national survey studies that unpack how Native omission shapes psychological processes among non‐Native and Native individuals and contribute to discrimination, oppression, and disparities facing Native Peoples. We then discuss ways in which Native Peoples are actively resisting Native omission. Finally, we provide a series of policy recommendations to address Native omission and promote Native equity. By making visible the pernicious consequences of omission for Native Peoples, we chart a path for creating a more equitable future.
Subject
Applied Psychology,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Social Psychology
Reference144 articles.
1. Cultural Continuity as a Determinant of Indigenous Peoples’ Health: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research in Canada and the United States
2. Basile K. C. Smith S. G. Kresnow M. Khatiwada S. &Leemis R. W.(2022).The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017 report on sexual violence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Violence Prevention.https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs/nisvsReportonSexualViolence.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献