Limits on Introspection

Author:

Corallo Guido1,Sackur Jérôme23,Dehaene Stanislas345,Sigman Mariano1

Affiliation:

1. Integrative Neuroscience Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Buenos Aires

2. Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (CNRS/ENS/EHESS), Paris, France

3. INSERM, U562, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Gif/Yvette, France

4. CEA, DSV/I2BM, NeuroSpin Center, Gif/Yvette, France

5. Collège de France

Abstract

Which cognitive processes are accessible to conscious report? To study the limits of conscious reportability, we designed a novel method of quantified introspection, in which subjects were asked, after each trial of a standard cognitive task, to estimate the time spent completing the task. We then applied classical mental-chronometry techniques, such as the additive-factors method, to analyze these introspective estimates of response time. We demonstrate that introspective response time can be a sensitive measure, tightly correlated with objective response time in a single-task context. In a psychological-refractory-period task, however, the objective processing delay resulting from interference by a second concurrent task is totally absent from introspective estimates. These results suggest that introspective estimates of time spent on a task tightly correlate with the period of availability of central processing resources.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Cited by 89 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Error modulates categorization of subsecond durations in multitasking contexts;Psychological Research;2024-03-16

2. Primacy Effects in Extended Cognitive Strategy Choice: Initial Speed Benefits Outweigh Later Speed Benefits;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2023-08-23

3. Time expectancies in dual tasking: Evidence for proactive resource sharing?;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance;2023-08

4. Decision Making in Moral Judgment Context is Modulated by Individual Metacognition;Psychological Reports;2023-07-26

5. How does it feel? Passage of time judgments in speeded RT performance;Psychological Research;2023-07-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3