Patient perceptions and understanding of pressure ulcer risk in the community: Empirical Research Qualitative

Author:

Ledger Lisa Jayne1ORCID,Worsley Peter R.2,Hope Jo23,Schoonhoven Lisette45

Affiliation:

1. School of Allied Health and Social Care University of Derby Derby UK

2. School of Health Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK

3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Wessex Southampton UK

4. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

5. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton UK

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo explore patient perceptions and understanding of their pressure ulcer risk and how information is communicated between a nurse and patient in the home setting.DesignA pragmatic qualitative research design including community‐dwelling patients, who were deemed at risk of developing a pressure ulcer.MethodsObservation of routine interactions between nurse and patient regarding their pressure ulcer risk and semi‐structured interviews with 15 community patients following the nursing interaction.ResultsFour key overarching themes emerged from the data analysis that were related to patient perceptions and understanding of pressure ulcer risk. These included Pressure Ulcer Awareness, Importance of Repositioning, Healthy Eating and Risk Interpretation.ConclusionPatient perception and understanding of pressure ulcer risk is different from the scientific, professional view. Patient risk perception was based on heuristics and wider personal factors and social influences.ImpactThe study provides important new insights into clinical practice in relation to how pressure ulcer advice and information are provided and interpreted in the community setting.Reporting MethodAdhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR)Patient or Public ContributionA small selection of patients within the NHS Trust in which the research was conducted contributed to the design of the study, in particular some of the interview questions and timing.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3