The detection of circulating tumor cells indicates poor therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Wang Shan1,Liu Xiaolin1,Lv Hongwei1,Yu Jing1ORCID,Li Huihui1

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe efficacy and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are controversial based on the existing research. This systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluated the significance of CTCs in NSCLC therapy monitoring and prognosis prediction, supporting their potential as clinical biomarkers.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI, and VIP through September 20, 2023. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies involving NSCLC patients, focusing on peripheral blood CTCs, and assessing outcomes such as pre‐ and posttreatment CTC rates or levels, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. We utilized Review Manager 5.4.1 for meta‐analysis, calculating pooled odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes, mean differences for continuous variables and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival data, applying fixed‐ or random‐effects models based on heterogeneity assessed by the I2 statistic. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42023450035).ResultsTwenty‐two eligible studies with a total of 1674 NSCLC patients were included. Meta‐analysis results showed that the CTCs‐positive rate (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77, p = 0.0001) and CTCs count (mean difference = –3.10, 95% CI –5.52 to –0.69, p = 0.01) were significantly decreased after antitumor treatment. Compared with the CTCs nonreduced group, the CTC‐reduced group showed better PFS (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.17, < 0.00001) and OS (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.86, p = 0.0003) after treatment. PFS and OS in CTC‐positive groups were lower than those in the CTCs‐negative group pretreatment (HR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.47, p < 0.00001; HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.52, p = 0.0006) and posttreatment (HR = 3.36, 95% CI 2.12 to 5.33, < 0.00001; HR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.75 to 6.27, p = 0.0002).ConclusionsCTCs can be used as a biomarker to monitor NSCLC efficacy, predict prognosis and guide follow‐up treatment.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3