The association between frailty and perceived physical and mental fatigability: The Long Life Family Study

Author:

Schumacher Benjamin T.1ORCID,Kehler Dustin S.2,Kulminski Alexander M.3,Qiao Yujia (Susanna)1,Andersen Stacy L.4ORCID,Gmelin Theresa1,Christensen Kaare56,Wojczynski Mary K.7,Theou Olga28ORCID,Rockwood Kenneth8,Newman Anne B.1,Glynn Nancy W.1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. School of Physiotherapy Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

3. Biodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

4. Department of Medicine Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Danish Aging Research Center University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

6. Departments of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Genetics Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

7. School of Medicine Washington University St. Louis Missouri USA

8. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHigher levels of frailty, quantified by a frailty index (FI), may be linked to fatigue severity as tasks become more physically and mentally demanding. Fatigue, a component of frailty research, has been ambiguous and inconsistent in its operationalization. Fatigability—the quantification of vulnerability to fatigue in relation to specific intensity and duration of activities—offers a more sensitive and standardized approach, though the association between frailty and fatigability has not been assessed.MethodsUsing cross‐sectional data from the Long Life Family Study at Visit 2 (2014–2017; N = 2524; mean age ± standard deviation (SD) 71.4 ± 11.2 years; 55% women; 99% White), we examined associations between an 83‐item FI after excluding fatigue items (ratio of number of health problems reported (numerator) out of the total assessed (denominator); higher ratio = greater frailty) and perceived physical and mental fatigability using the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) (range 0–50; higher scores = greater fatigability).ResultsParticipants had mean ± standard deviation FI (0.08 ± 0.06; observed range: 0.0–0.43), PFS Physical (13.7 ± 9.6; 39.5% more severe, ≥15), and PFS Mental (7.9 ± 8.9; 22.8% more severe, ≥13). The prevalence of more severe physical and mental fatigability was higher across FI quartiles. In mixed effects models accounting for family structure, a clinically meaningful 3%‐higher FI was associated with 1.9 points higher PFS Physical score (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–2.1) and 1.7 points higher PFS Mental score (95% CI 1.5–1.9) after adjusting for covariates.ConclusionsFrailty was associated with perceived physical and mental fatigability severity. Understanding this association may support the development of interventions to mitigate the risks associated with greater frailty and perceived fatigability. Including measurements of perceived fatigability, in lieu of fatigue, in frailty indices has the potential to alleviate the inconsistencies and ambiguity surrounding the operationalization of fatigue and provide a more precise and sensitive measurement of frailty.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3