Who affiliates with SMART recovery? A comparison of individuals attending SMART recovery, alcoholics anonymous, both, or neither

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMutual‐help organizations (MHOs) play a crucial role for many individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) or other substance use disorders in achieving stable remission. While there is now substantial research characterizing who uses 12‐step MHOs, very little is known about who becomes affiliated with newer and rapidly growing MHOs, such as Self‐Management and Recovery Training (“SMART” Recovery). More research could inform knowledge regarding who may be best engaged by these differing pathways.MethodsWe conducted a cross‐sectional analysis of participants (N = 361) with AUD recruited mostly from the community who were starting a new recovery attempt and self‐selected into one of four different recovery paths: (1) SMART Recovery (“SMART‐only”; n = 75); (2) Alcoholics Anonymous (“AA‐only”; n = 73); (3) Both SMART and AA (“Both”; n = 53); and (4) Neither SMART nor AA (“Neither”; n = 160). We compared the groups on demographics, clinical history, treatment and recovery support service use, and indices of functioning and well‐being. We computed descriptives and conducted inferential analyses according to the data structure.ResultsCompared to study participants choosing AA‐only or Both, SMART‐only participants were more likely to be White, married, have higher income and more education, be full‐time employed, and evince a pattern of lower clinical severity characterized by less lifetime and recent treatment and recovery support services usage, lower alcohol use intensity and fewer consequences, and less legal involvement. AUD symptom levels, lifetime psychiatric diagnoses, psychiatric distress, and functioning were similar across MHO‐engaged groups.ConclusionSMART Recovery appears to attract individuals with greater psychosocial stability and economic advantage and less severe histories of alcohol‐related impairment and legal involvement. Findings suggest that certain aspects specific to the SMART Recovery group approach, format, and/or contents may appeal to individuals exhibiting this type of profile. As such, SMART appears to provide an additional resource that expands the repertoire of options for individuals with AUD who seek recovery.