Improvements and challenges in intraperitoneal laparoscopic para‐aortic lymphadenectomy: The novel “tent‐pitching” antegrade approach and vascular anatomical variations in the para‐aortic region

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThis study introduces and compares a new intraperitoneal laparoscopic para‐aortic lymphadenectomy method to reach the level of the renal vein, the “tent‐pitching” antegrade approach with the retrograde approach in gynecological malignancy surgeries in terms of success rate, complication incidence, and the number of lymph nodes removed. It focuses on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Meanwhile, this article reports on the vascular anatomical variations discovered in the para‐aortic region to enhance surgical safety.Material and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study including patients undergone laparoscopic para‐aortic lymphadenectomy at a single center from January 2020 to December 2023 for high‐risk endometrial and early‐stage ovarian cancer. Patient charts were reviewed for mode of operation, perioperative complications, operative details, and histopathology. The patients were divided into anterograde group and retrograde group according to the operation mode. The two groups were further compared based on the success rate of lymph node clearance at the renal vein level, perioperative complications, and the number of removed lymph nodes. Quantitative data were analyzed using the t‐test, non‐normally distributed data using the rank‐sum test, and categorical data using Fisher's exact test and the chi‐square test, with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05.ResultsAmong 173 patients, the antegrade group showed higher surgery success (97.5% vs 68.82%), more lymph nodes removed (median 14 vs 7), and less median blood loss. The operation time was shorter in the antegrade group. Postoperative complications like lymphocele and venous thrombosis were lower in the antegrade group. Vascular abnormalities were found in 28.9% of patients, with accessory lumbar vein routing anomaly and accessory renal arteries being most common.ConclusionsThe antegrade approach is feasible, safe, and effective, improving surgical exposure, reducing difficulty without additional instruments or puncture sites, and minimizing organ damage risk. It is effective in achieving better access to the renal vein and removing more para‐aortic lymph nodes than the retrograde method. Recognizing and carefully managing the diverse vascular abnormalities in the para‐aortic area, including variations in renal arteries, veins, and the inferior vena cava, is essential to reduce intraoperative bleeding and the likelihood of converting to open surgery.