Intraindividual comparison of prognostic imaging features of HCCs between MRIs with extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents

Abstract

AbstractBackground & AimsAccumulating evidence suggests that certain imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may have prognostic implications. This study aimed to intraindividually compare MRIs with extracellular contrast agent (ECA‐MRI) and hepatobiliary agent (HBA‐MRI) for prognostic imaging features of HCC and to compare the prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) and early recurrence between the two MRIs.MethodsThe present study included 102 prospectively enrolled at‐risk patients (median age, 61.0 years; 83 men) with surgically resected single HCC with both preoperative ECA‐MRI and HBA‐MRI between July 2019 and June 2023. The McNemar test was used to compare each prognostic imaging feature between the two MRIs. Significant imaging features associated with MVI were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis, and early recurrence rates (<2 years) were compared between the two MRIs.ResultsThe frequencies of prognostic imaging features were not significantly different between the two MRIs (p = .07 to >.99). Non‐smooth tumour margin (ECA‐MRI, odds ratio [OR] = 5.30; HBA‐MRI, OR = 7.07) and peritumoral arterial phase hyperenhancement (ECA‐MRI, OR = 4.26; HBA‐MRI, OR = 4.43) were independent factors significantly associated with MVI on both MRIs. Two‐trait predictor of venous invasion (presence of internal arteries and absence of hypoattenuating halo) on ECA‐MRI (OR = 11.24) and peritumoral HBP hypointensity on HBA‐MRI (OR = 20.42) were other predictors of MVI. Early recurrence rates of any two or more significant imaging features (49.8% on ECA‐MRI vs 51.3% on HBA‐MRI, p = .75) were not significantly different between the two MRIs.ConclusionPrognostic imaging features of HCC may be comparable between ECA‐MRI and HBA‐MRI.