Effect of high‐flow nasal and buccal oxygenation on safe apnea time in children with open mouth: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHigh‐flow nasal oxygenation is reported to prolong duration of apnea while maintaining adequate oxygen saturation with the mouth closed. Also, buccal oxygenation is known to have similar effects in obese adults. We compared the effect of these two methods on prolongation of acceptable apnea time in pediatric patients with their mouth open.MethodsThirty‐eight patients, aged 0–10 years were randomly allocated to either the high‐flow nasal oxygenation group (n = 17) or the buccal oxygenation group (n = 21). After induction of anesthesia including neuromuscular blockade, manual ventilation was initiated until the expiratory oxygen concentration reached 90%. Subsequently, ventilation was paused, and the patient's head was extended, and mouth was opened. The HFNO group received 2 L·min−1·kg−1 of oxygen, and the BO group received 0.5 L·min−1·kg−1 of oxygen. We set a target apnea time according to previous literature. When the apnea time reached the target, we defined the case as “success” in prolongation of safe apnea time and resumed ventilation. When the pulse oximetry decreased to 92% before the target apnea time, it was recorded as “failure” and rescue ventilation was given.ResultsThe success rate of safe apnea prolongation was 100% in the high‐flow nasal oxygenation group compared to 76% in the buccal oxygenation group (p = .04). Oxygen reserve index, end‐tidal or transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure, and pulse oximetry did not differ between groups.ConclusionHigh‐flow nasal oxygenation is effective in maintaining appropriate arterial oxygen saturation during apnea even in children with their mouth open and is superior to buccal oxygenation. Buccal oxygenation may be a good alternative when high‐flow nasal oxygenation is not available.