A hybrid systematic narrative review of instruments measuring home‐based care nurses' competency

Author:

Rusli Khairul Dzakirin Bin1ORCID,Chua Wei Ling1ORCID,Ang Wei How Darryl1ORCID,Ang Seng Giap Marcus2ORCID,Lau Ying3ORCID,Liaw Sok Ying1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

2. Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia

3. The Nethersole School of Nursing The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of the study was to identify and synthesize the contents and the psychometric properties of the existing instruments measuring home‐based care (HBC) nurses' competencies.DesignA hybrid systematic narrative review was performed.Review MethodsThe eligible studies were reviewed to identify the competencies measured by the instruments for HBC nurses. The psychometric properties of instruments in development and psychometric testing design studies were also examined. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and COSMIN checklist accordingly.Data SourcesRelevant studies were searched on CINAHL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, PsychINFO and Scopus from 2000 to 2022. The search was limited to full‐text items in the English language.ResultsA total of 23 studies reporting 24 instruments were included. 12 instruments were adopted or modified by the studies while the other 12 were developed and psychometrically tested by the studies. None of the instruments encompassed all of the 10 home‐based nursing care competencies identified in an earlier study. The two most frequently measured competencies were the management of health conditions, and critical thinking and problem‐solving skills, while the two least measured competencies were quality and safety, and technological literacy. The content and structural validity of most instruments were inadequate since the adopted instruments were not initially designed or tested among HBC nurses.ConclusionThis review provides a consolidation of existing instruments that were used to assess HBC nurses' competencies. The instruments were generally not comprehensive, and the content and structural validity were limited. Nonetheless, the domains, items and approaches to instrument development could be adopted to develop and test a comprehensive competency instrument for home‐based nursing care practice in the future.ImpactThis review consolidated instruments used to measure home‐based care nurses' competency. The instruments were often designed for ward‐based care nurses hence a comprehensive and validated home‐based nursing care competency instrument is needed. Nurses, researchers and nursing leaders could consider the competency instruments identified in this review to measure nurses' competencies, while a home‐based nursing care competency scale is being developed.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution was required in this review.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A literature review on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures: definitions, processes, causes and consequences;Review of International Business and Strategy;2024-07-03

2. The need for acute assessments in home healthcare - Swedish registered nurses’ experiences;International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being;2024-06-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3