Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in case of dyspepsia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAffecting between 20% and 90% of the world's population depending on the geo‐socio‐economic conditions, Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection requires an adapted management because of the medico‐economic stakes it generates. Also responsible for dyspepsia, the management of Hp infection differs in this context between international guidelines.ObjectivesThe primary outcome of the study was assessing the quality of current guidelines for HP eradication in dyspepsia. The secondary was defining the best therapeutic strategy for patients consulting with dyspepsia in the outpatient setting.MethodsClinical practice guidelines (CPG) published between January 2000 and May 2021 were retrieved from various databases (PubMed; Guidelines International Network; websites of scientific societies that issued the guidelines). Their quality was assessed using the AGREE II evaluation grid. To provide decision support for healthcare practitioners, particularly in primary care, a summary of the main points of interest for management was made for each guideline.ResultsFourteen guidelines were included. Only four (28.6%) could be validated according to AGREE II? Most of the non‐validated guidelines had low ratings in the “Rigour of development” and “Applicability” domains with means of 40% [8%–71%] and 14% [0%–25%], respectively. Three out of four validated guidelines (75%) advocated a “test and treat” strategy for dyspepsia based on the national prevalence of Hp. Gastroscopy was the 1st line examination method in case of warning signs or high risk of gastric cancer. Triple therapy (Proton pomp inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) was favored for Hp eradication but required a study of the sensitivity to clarithromycin in the validated guidelines. Antibiotic resistance also had an impact on treatment duration.ConclusionsMany guidelines were of poor quality, providing few decision‐making tools for practical use. Conversely, those of good quality had established a management strategy addressing the current problems associated with the emergence of antibiotic‐resistant strains.