Development and validation of a prognostic model for death 30 days after adult emergency laparotomy

Author:

Eugene N.1,Kuryba A.1,Martin P.2,Oliver C. M.3,Berry M.4,Moppett I. K.5,Johnston C.6,Hare S.7,Lockwood S.8,Murray D.9,Walker K.10,Cromwell D. A.10,

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Effectiveness Unit Royal College of Surgeons of England London UK

2. Department of Applied Health Research University College London London UK

3. UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK

4. Critical Care King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK

5. Anaesthesia and Critical Care Section, Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Repair University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

6. Department of Anaesthesia St George's Hospital London UK

7. Department of Anaesthesia Medway Maritime Hospital Gillingham Kent UK

8. Colorectal Surgery Department Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Bradford UK

9. Department of Anaesthesia James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK

10. Department of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK

Abstract

SummaryThe probability of death after emergency laparotomy varies greatly between patients. Accurate pre‐operative risk prediction is fundamental to planning care and improving outcomes. We aimed to develop a model limited to a few pre‐operative factors that performed well irrespective of surgical indication: obstruction; sepsis; ischaemia; bleeding; and other. We derived a model with data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit for patients who had emergency laparotomy between December 2016 and November 2018. We tested the model on patients who underwent emergency laparotomy between December 2018 and November 2019. There were 4077/40,816 (10%) deaths 30 days after surgery in the derivation cohort. The final model had 13 pre‐operative variables: surgical indication; age; blood pressure; heart rate; respiratory history; urgency; biochemical markers; anticipated malignancy; anticipated peritoneal soiling; and ASA physical status. The predicted mortality probability deciles ranged from 0.1% to 47%. There were 1888/11,187 deaths in the test cohort. The scaled Brier score, integrated calibration index and concordance for the model were 20%, 0.006 and 0.86, respectively. Model metrics were similar for the five surgical indications. In conclusion, we think that this prognostic model is suitable to support decision‐making before emergency laparotomy as well as for risk adjustment for comparing organisations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model

2. Royal College of Surgeons of England.The High‐Risk General Surgical Patient: Raising the Standard. 2018.https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/‐/media/files/rcs/news‐and‐events/media‐centre/2018‐press‐releases‐documents/rcs‐report‐the‐highrisk‐general‐surgical‐patient‐‐raising‐the‐standard‐‐december‐2018.pdf(accessed 26/06/2023).

3. Model for risk adjustment of postoperative mortality in patients with colorectal cancer

4. Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM)

5. Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3