Changes in the treatment landscape of metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: A multicenter study

Author:

Urabe Fumihiko1ORCID,Muramoto Katsuki1,Yanagisawa Takafumi1ORCID,Fukuokaya Wataru1ORCID,Mori Keiichiro1ORCID,Tashiro Kojiro12,Katsumi Kota1,Takahashi Hidetsugu1,Yoshihara Kentaro12,Miyajima Keiichiro1ORCID,Imai Yu1ORCID,Iwatani Kosuke13,Kayano Sotaro1,Igarashi Taro1,Murakami Masaya1,Tsuzuki Shunsuke1ORCID,Shimomura Tatsuya1,Yamada Hiroki12,Miki Jun13ORCID,Kimura Takahiro1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Urology Jikei Katsushika Medical Center Tokyo Japan

3. Department of Urology Jikei Kashiwa Hospital Chiba Japan

Abstract

BackgroundA multicenter database was utilized to examine the current treatment landscape and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with mHSPC who commenced treatment between February 2018 and June 2023. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess oncological outcomes, including time to castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), progression‐free survival 2 (PFS2, duration from initial treatment to tumor progression during second‐line treatment), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of treatment choices on oncological outcomes. In addition, the incidence rate of adverse events was assessed.ResultsIn total, 829 patients were analyzed; 42.5% received ARSIs with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 44.0% received combined androgen blockade (CAB), and 13.5% received ADT alone. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated higher rates of CRPC and shorter PFS2 in patients treated with CAB versus ARSIs with ADT. By contrast, CSS and OS were not significantly different between the ARSI with ADT group and the CAB group. Grades 3–4 adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving CAB and 6.0% of those receiving ARSIs with ADT.ConclusionsInitial treatment with ARSIs in combination with ADT resulted in a longer time to CRPC and longer PFS2 compared to CAB. Although CAB and ADT alone were associated with fewer adverse events, ARSIs with ADT should be considered a first‐line treatment option given its superior oncological outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3