Affiliation:
1. Geschwister‐Scholl‐Institut für Politikwissenschaft Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
2. Geschwister‐Scholl‐Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Theorien der Politik Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
3. Institutt for Statsvitenskap University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Abstract
AbstractResearch on policy implementation traditionally has focused on understanding the success or failure of individual policies within specific contexts. Little attention has been given to the challenges that emerge from the cumulative growth of policy portfolios over time. This paper is addressing this research gap by examining the phenomenon of organizational policy triage, which occurs when implementation organizations face overload and are forced to make trade‐off decisions between the implementation of the different policies in their portfolios. We investigate empirical patterns of policy triage across 16 social and environmental implementation agencies in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and UK). We show that variation in policy triage can be explained by the combination of three central factors: blame‐shifting opportunities, the mobilization of external resources, and the commitment to compensate for overload by implementation authorities.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献