Bureaucratic overload and organizational policy triage: A comparative study of implementation agencies in five European countries

Author:

Zink Dionys1ORCID,Knill Christoph2ORCID,Steinebach Yves3

Affiliation:

1. Geschwister‐Scholl‐Institut für Politikwissenschaft Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany

2. Geschwister‐Scholl‐Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Theorien der Politik Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany

3. Institutt for Statsvitenskap University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Abstract

AbstractResearch on policy implementation traditionally has focused on understanding the success or failure of individual policies within specific contexts. Little attention has been given to the challenges that emerge from the cumulative growth of policy portfolios over time. This paper is addressing this research gap by examining the phenomenon of organizational policy triage, which occurs when implementation organizations face overload and are forced to make trade‐off decisions between the implementation of the different policies in their portfolios. We investigate empirical patterns of policy triage across 16 social and environmental implementation agencies in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and UK). We show that variation in policy triage can be explained by the combination of three central factors: blame‐shifting opportunities, the mobilization of external resources, and the commitment to compensate for overload by implementation authorities.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Reference64 articles.

1. Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap

2. On democratic intelligence and failure: The vice and virtue of incrementalism under political fragmentation and policy accumulation

3. Rule growth and government effectiveness: why it takes the capacity to learn and coordinate to constrain rule growth

4. Adie S.(2023).Eustice blames ‘management failure’ not budget cuts for EA river pollution performance.ENDS Report.https://www.endsreport.com/article/1813804/eustice‐blames‐management‐failure‐not‐budget‐cuts‐ea‐river‐pollution‐performance

5. The organizational melting-pot: an arena for different cultures

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3