Optimal dosing of gliclazide—A model‐based approach

Author:

Mim Sabiha R.1,Hussein Haneen1,Vidadi Samira1,Leisegang Rory12,Karamchand Sumanth3,Rambiritch Virendra4,Cotton Mark F.2,Naidoo Poobalan5,Kjellsson Maria C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacometric Research Group, Department of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

2. Family Center for Research with Ubuntu, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

3. Division of Cardiology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

4. Discipline of Pharmaceutical Science University of KwaZulu‐Natal Durban South Africa

5. Department of Nephrology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine University of KwaZulu‐Natal Durban South Africa

Abstract

AbstractGliclazide was approved as a treatment for type 2 diabetes in an era before model‐based drug development, and consequently, the recommended doses were not optimised with modern methods. To investigate various dosing regimens of gliclazide, we used publicly available data to characterise the dose‐response relationship using pharmacometric models. A literature search identified 21 published gliclazide pharmacokinetic (PK) studies with full profiles. These were digitised, and a PK model was developed for immediate‐ (IR) and modified‐release (MR) formulations. Data from a gliclazide dose‐ranging study of postprandial glucose were used to characterise the concentration–response relationship using the integrated glucose–insulin model. Simulations from the full model showed that the maximum effect was 44% of the patients achieving HbA1c <7%, with 11% experiencing glucose <3 mmol/L and the most sensitive patients (i.e., 5% most extreme) experiencing 35 min of hypoglycaemia. Simulations revealed that the recommended IR dose (320 mg) was appropriate with no efficacy gain with increased dose. However, the recommended dose for the MR formulation may be increased to 270 mg, with more patients achieving HbA1c goals (i.e., HbA1c <7%) without a hypoglycaemic risk higher than the resulting risk from the recommended IR dose.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology,Toxicology,General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3