Do politically connected subsidy recipients disclose less subsidy information?

Author:

Li Ningzhong1,Tan Youchao2,Zeng Cheng3

Affiliation:

1. Jindal School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Richardson Texas USA

2. School of Management Jinan University Guangzhou China

3. School of Accounting and Finance Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong Hong Kong

Abstract

AbstractThis paper examines the association between firms’ political connections and their voluntary disclosure of information related to government subsidies, using a sample of Chinese non‐state‐owned enterprises. We find that politically connected subsidy recipients disclose less information about their subsidies (source and policy basis) in their annual reports than do unconnected firms. This association is mainly driven by connected firms whose subsidies are difficult to justify and are stronger for firms registered in more corrupt provinces and firms with higher media attention. In addition, connected firms disclosing more subsidy information receive fewer future subsidies than do other connected firms. These findings suggest that politically connected subsidy recipients tend to withhold subsidy information to reduce the costs that accompany public scrutiny of subsidies granted through relationships.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Reference63 articles.

1. The association between outside directors, institutional investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts;Ajinkya B.;Journal of Accounting Research,2005

2. Law, finance, and economic growth in China;Allen F.;Journal of Financial Economics,2005

3. Aobdia D. Koester A. &Petacchi R.(2021).Political connections and government subsidies: State‐level evidence. Working paper. Pennsylvania State University.

4. Causality redux: The evolution of empirical methods in accounting research and the growth of quasi‐experiments;Armstrong C.;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2022

5. Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosure: Evidence from derivative lawsuits;Bourveau T.;Journal of Accounting Research,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3