Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law

Author:

Togawa Yaei1ORCID,Kawashima Shusuke2,Nagai Kazue3ORCID,Kawasaki Yohei45,Matsue Hiroyuki2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan

2. Department of Dermatology Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan

3. Gunma University Center for Food Science and Wellness Gunma Japan

4. Clinical Research Center Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan

5. Faculty of Nursing Japanese Red Cross College of Nursing Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFew studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was constant.Materials and methodsThis study, conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, included 15 healthy adults aged 20–65 years (mean age, 46.3 years; seven men). Using ultraviolet excimer treatment devices with different irradiances (50 or 150 mW/cm2), the upper abdomen of each participant was irradiated with ultraviolet light at set irradiation doses (80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 mJ/cm2). The erythema index of each irradiated site was measured using a melanin‐ and erythema‐measuring device, and the difference in erythema index before and 24 h after irradiation was the primary endpoint.ResultsThe change in erythema index was significantly higher for an irradiance of 150 mW/cm2. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between these irradiance levels at irradiation doses of 100‒200 mJ/cm2.ConclusionsEven for the same irradiation dose, stronger erythematous reactions occurred at higher irradiances in ultraviolet excimer treatment. This suggests that the reciprocity law may not always hold true in excimer therapy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3