Influence of partially exposed nonabsorbable membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial

Author:

Matumoto Edson Ken1,Corrêa Mônica Grazieli1,Couso‐Queiruga Emilio2,Monteiro Mabelle Freitas1ORCID,Graham Zachary3,Braz Silvia Helena Garcia1,Ribeiro Fernanda Vieira1,Pimentel Suzana Peres1,Cirano Fabiano Ribeiro1,Casati Marcio Zaffalon1

Affiliation:

1. Dental Research Division, School of Dentistry Paulista University São Paulo Brazil

2. Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

3. Department of Periodontics University of Iowa College of Dentistry Iowa City Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractAimThis randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of a partially exposed non‐absorbable membrane (dPTFE) in Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) procedures on clinical, tomographic, immunoenzymatic, implant‐related, and patient‐centered outcomes.Materials and methodsPatients with a hopeless maxillary single‐rooted tooth demanding rehabilitation with implants were included. Patients were randomized into two groups: dPTFE (n = 22)—tooth extraction followed by ARP using a partially exposed dPTFE membrane; USH (n = 22)—unassisted socket healing. Clinical and tomographic analyses were performed at baseline and after 3 months. After 3 months, patients received one dental implant. Implant stability quotient was obtained following implant placement. Bone‐related markers were analyzed in bone biopsies using an immunoenzymatic assay.ResultsGreater gain in Keratinized Mucosa Width (KMW) was observed in the dPTFE (1.33 ± 0.98 mm) compared to USH (0.59 ± 0.98 mm) (Mann–Whitney test, Z = 2,28, p < 0.05). USH showed a reduction of pain/discomfort, edema, and interference with daily life from the seventh day (Friedman/Wilcoxon test, maxT = 7.48, 8.00, and 5.92, respectively, p < 0.05). dPTFE presents a reduction of edema and interference with daily life from the 7th day and pain/discomfort from the 14th day (Friedman/Wilcoxon test, maxT = 5.40, 5.26, and 4.78, respectively, p < 0.05). The dPTFE group presented higher pain/discomfort in the 35 and 42 days and higher edema from 7 to 42 days postoperatively than USH group (Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.05). No differences between groups were observed in the tomographic measures, immunoenzymatic analysis, and implant stability (p > 0.05).ConclusiondPTFE was superior to USH by increasing KMW gain. However, dPTFE without bone graft presented similar bone loss compared to USH. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization (NCT04329351).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry,Oral Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3